Checks technical arguments for problem, mechanism, and evidence alignment, then helps revise scientific manuscripts with evidence-bounded claims, consistent terminology, and concise Elsevier/COMPAG-style prose
Install
- 1Add it in ChatGPT
Open Plugins in the ChatGPT sidebar (web or desktop), search for “Research Writing Guardrails” and select +. You'll be asked to sign in to any connected service on first use. Then type @ in a chat to call it.
Skills 2
- compag-elsevier-paper-editing
Use when drafting, revising, shortening, polishing, or auditing technical manuscript text for an Elsevier Computers and Electronics in Agriculture style. Prioritize precision, concision, evidence-bounded claims, terminology consistency, and high information density while preserving frozen technical content. Avoid colons and italic emphasis in manuscript prose and use hyphens only where technically or grammatically standard.
- research-problem-mechanism-evidence
Use for scientific research analysis, technical system or algorithm design, method reasoning, experiment interpretation, claim auditing, and research-paper argumentation. Enforce consistency among the real technical problem, the mechanism introduced to address it, observable consequences, and the strength of available evidence. Do not use for casual nontechnical writing.
Things to ask
- “Audit this technical argument for problem–mechanism–evidence consistency and flag unsupported causal claims.”
- “Revise this text in concise COMPAG style while preserving technical meaning, frozen data, definitions, and evidence scope.”
- “Check this manuscript for alignment among Introduction claims, Method mechanisms, experiments, Results, and Conclusion.”